SWATeam Charge Letter for FY17
Associated Project(s):
The charge letter was sent to FY17 SWATeam members, noting that the clerks will be reaching out to help schedule meetings for the fall.
Attached Files:
You are here
Projects Updates for Transportation SWATeam
Pages
iWG meeting agenda March 30, 2016
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:iWG meeting meeting March 30, 2016
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis recommendation - Returned to the SWATeam
Associated Project(s):The iCAP Working Group (iWG) met on February 16, 2016, to discuss the SWATeam recommendation, Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis. The iWG's final comment was:
"What would be the end result? There are many reasons to travel, some are optional and some are not. For example, junior faculty who are working on tenure need to network and engage with other experts in their area. Other times, it may be sufficient to conduct business or the meeting virtually. This is more of a sociological study, maybe a student in the Sociology department can help. Jess Tang will work with the SWATeam to see if this is plausible."
Following the iWG meeting, this recommendation was returned to the Transportation SWATeam for further discussion within the SWATeam.
See SWATeam recommendation Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis here.
Trans006 Differential Parking Pricing for Shared Vehicles recommendation - Returned to the SWATeam
Associated Project(s):The iCAP Working Group (iWG) met on February 16, 2016, to discuss the SWATeam recommendation, Trans006 Differential Parking Pricing for Shared Vehicles. The iWG's final comment was:
"Study to determine if differential pricing for campus parking will encourage car sharing.The study of the parking pricing structure and alternatives for changing it can be very complex and involve a lot of issues. Have they addressed this in their recent Parking Master Plan effort? It was suggested to add Brian Farber from Parking to the Transportation SWATeam and examine what has been addressed in their Master Plan, before undertaking this study."
Following the iWG meeting, this recommendation was returned to the Transportation SWATeam for further discussion within the SWATeam.
See SWATeam recommendation Trans006 Differential Parking Pricing for Shared Vehicles here.
Trans007 Campus fleet analysis and Planning recommendation - Returned to SWATeam
Associated Project(s):The iCAP Working Group (iWG) met on February 16, 2016, to discuss the SWATeam recommendation, Trans007 Campus Fleet Analysis and Planning. The iWG's final comment was:
"They have suggested that this analysis is ideally completed by an industry professional. The iWG recommends that this study can be broken down into phases where phase 1 could be done by students, and phase 2 then could be done by an outside consultant (industry expert). Ben will suggest this to the SWATeam."
Following the iWG meeting, this recommendation was returned to the Transportation SWATeam for further discussion and modification to the recommendation within the SWATeam.
See SWATeam recommendation Trans007 Campus Fleet Analysis and Planning here.
iWG meeting minutes February 16, 2016
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:iWG meeting agenda February 16, 2016
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:Trans006 Differential Parking Pricing for Shared Vehicles recommendation - Submittal
Associated Project(s):The Transportation SWATeam submitted a recommendation to the iWG stating,
"Differential parking pricing for shared vehicles. One identified venue to encourage car sharing among faculty/staff and students is via differential pricing of campus parking permits. The basic idea is to sell parking permits at different prices for different lots, different vehicle types, and different users. The spots in the popular lots shall be sold at higher prices, while those sharing cars (i.e., two or more persons purchasing one permit for one vehicle) or using low-emission vehicles shall receive discounts and/or priority for getting into a popular lot. It is proposed that a study could be performed in two phases, as follows:
Phase I: Feasibility study that
1. Conducts a series of surveys to (i) understand the attitude of the parking department, current users, and the general public toward the proposed differential pricing scheme; and (ii) collect information on the campus commute patterns (single vehicle vs. carpool vs. CUMTD transit, origin/destinations, and vehicle types).
2. Collects data on campus parking capacity, utilization pattern, and demand profile.
3. Develops statistical/econometric models based on the collected data to inform us about the likelihood for users to adapt their vehicle usage and parking preferences in the context of parking price change.Phase II: Pilot implementation study that
4. Evaluates the effectiveness of differential pricing on enhancing parking capacity utilization and reducing single-occupancy vehicle usage, with possible field implementation on a small scale."See attached the SWATeam recommendation complete with comments from all the Transportation SWATeam members.
Attached Files:Trans001 TEM_DMI recommendation - Supplanted
Associated Project(s):The OBFS department sent their response to the iCAP Working Group (iWG) on September 23, 2015, which was then forwarded to the Transportation SWATeam in October. The Transportation SWATeam supplanted the Trans001 TEM_DMI recommendation with the new Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis recommendation.
See the new SWATeam recommendation Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis here.
See Transmittal of SWAteam recommendation of Trans001 TEM_DMI here.
See iWG assessment of Trans001 TEM_DMI here.
See SWATeam recommendation Trans001 TEM_DMI here.
Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis recommendation - Submittal
Associated Project(s):The Transportation SWATeam submitted a new recommendation, Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis, that supplanted the old recommendation, Trans001 TEM_DMI. The SWATeam stated,
"Travel demand analysis on reducing air travel emissions. It was proposed that a travel demand study be conducted to find out quantitatively how university business travelers select air travel against other alternatives (such as web-conference, train, driving). The outcome will then be used to develop incentives or policies to reduce air travels and emissions. This study could be conducted in two phases:
Phase 1. Collect 1-2 years of data on individual travel decisions, including travelers’ socio-economic characteristics, and the alternatives they have. This includes analysis of the current Travel and Expense Management (TEM) database (e.g., the reported travel purpose and funding source) to collect basic information about current air travel. Part of the effort can involve adding new questions to the current TEM reimbursement process. An additional survey to the general public might be necessary to account for those who choose not to travel.
Phase 2. Statistical/econometric models (e.g., discrete choice models) will be developed based on the data collected in Phase 1. The outcome will inform us what factors contribute to air travel versus other available options, and what it takes to change the travelers’ decisions. Based on the findings, the researcher could recommend programs to (i) provide incentives for campus units to reduce their annual air travel emissions; and (ii) educate/support the campus community on alternatives to air travel, such as trains and video conferencing."
See attached the SWATeam recommendation, Trans005 Travel Demand Analysis, complete with comments from all the Transportation SWATeam members.
See the Supplanted SWATeam recommendation Trans001 TEM_DMI here.
Attached Files:Trans007 Campus fleet analysis and Planning recommendation - Submittal
Associated Project(s):The Transportation SWATeam submitted a recommendation to the iWG stating,
"Campus fleet analysis and planning. The campus fleet includes department-owned vehicles, the car and truck pool vehicles, and the heavy equipment pool (mainly diesel-fueled large construction equipment). It is proposed that a feasibility study be performed on campus that:
1. Reviews the campus sustainability goals in the context of the University fleet;
2. Analyzes existing fleet data (i.e., fleet composition, ownership, usage/mileage profile) and future demand;
3. Evaluates current vehicle technology, fleet size, fuel types and availability;
4. Proposes collection of additional data (if needed);
5. Identifies various plans and anticipated cost/benefit results. Some of the options include: converting regular fuels to compressed natural gas, electricity, or biodiesel, increasing the portion of low-emission hybrid vehicles."See attached the SWATeam recommendation, Trans007 Campus Fleet Analysis and Planning, complete with comments from all the Transportation SWATeam members.
See the supplanted SWATeam recommendation Trans004 Fleet Study here.
Attached Files:December 11, 2015 Meeting
Associated Project(s):Meeting notes from December 11, 2015 meeting of the transportation SWATeam.
Attached are typed notes from Ben Cigelnik and handwritten notes by Claire Dodinval.
Attached Files:9-28-2015 Meeting Notes
Associated Project(s):Meeting notes for Transportation SWATeam meeting on September 28, 2015
Attached Files:iWG meeting agenda September 25, 2015
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:iWG meeting minutes September 25, 2015
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:9-14-2015 Meeting Notes
Associated Project(s):Meeting notes for the September 14th, 2015 Transportation SWATeam
Attached Files:iWG meeting agenda August 28, 2015
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:iWG meeting minutes August 28, 2015
Associated Project(s):see file
Attached Files:Jul 9 2015 Minutes
Associated Project(s):see file
Several SWATeam recommendations were discussed. Also, an update from the Sustainability Council was provided:
"Review of Council Meeting/Status of iCAP Approval - The Sustainability Council meeting went very well with lots of good discussion. There were not too many serious objections to the iCAP. They would like to see financial information, such as cost-benefit analysis on projects. This information will be included in the study for accelerating our carbon neutrality date. The cover letter from the Chancellor affirming our commitment will include language about the current fiscal climate in Illinois. The Chancellor was keen to be able to reach carbon neutrality by 2035. Other concerns were in regard to the net zero space item and they suggested a space audit be included in the iCAP."
Attached Files:
Pages
